On Thursday 19 April 2001 07:41, Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, David Olofson wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 April 2001 00:39, David Schleef wrote:
> > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >
> > Not that I've had serious problems with the RTL list, but I do agree with
> > all points made in that document.
> >
> > BTW, if mailers were to have a third reply method, one that replies only
> > to the "To:" address would be nice.
>
> Many mail programs _have_ this third option already! I use pine, and
> that option has always been there... (In fact, I let it ask me which
> option to choose interactively.)

Guess I'll just have to dump KMail, or fix it... (Or did I miss some nice 
news?)


//David

.- M A I A -------------------------------------------------.
|      Multimedia Application Integration Architecture      |
| A Free/Open Source Plugin API for Professional Multimedia |
`----------------------> http://www.linuxaudiodev.com/maia -'
.- David Olofson -------------------------------------------.
| Audio Hacker - Open Source Advocate - Singer - Songwriter |
`--------------------------------------> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -'
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/

Reply via email to