I have found the same. When using a RT-FIFO I discovered that is 
impossible (rtl 3.0 in 2.4.1 Linux Kernel) to implement a handler to a 
FIFO and inside the handler's code ask for access to the same FIFO. 
Maybe Mr. Victor Yodaiken had implemented two FIFO in order to 
"emulates" only one.   
   The code implements a handler to a FIFO and inside the code he acess 
another one, intead of doing all this actions at once.

   Alex

Minich, Raymond C wrote:

> Can somebody point me in the right direction regarding why the example
> "frank" creates/opens/initializes five (5) fifos
> but the documentation only refers to 3 of them being used by the
> application?
> 
> init_module does a......... 
> 
> rtf_destroy(1); 
> thru
> rtf_destroy(5); 
> 
> then a......
> 
> c[0] = rtf_create(1,4000);
> c[1] = rtf_create(2,4000);
> 
> then a 
> c[2] = rtf_create(3,200);
> c[3] = rtf_create(4,100);
> c[4] = rtf_create(5,100);
> 
> 
> What are FIFO's 1 & 2 for?? What is their purpose?
> 
> Thanks for any advise you have for me in this matter
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ray Minich
> Dresser Inc..
> 
> ----- End of forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
> -- [rtl] ---
> To unsubscribe:
> echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
> echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> http://www.rtlinux.org/
> 
> 
> 

----- End of forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/

Reply via email to