> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Norm Dresner wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > Second, please don't interpret what I said as meaning
> > that a FIFO-fullness function is worthless. I have myself
> > hacked up an older version of RTLinux to make certain
> > normally internal FIFO routine variables public so I could
> > in fact do just that. What I was saying was that in the
> > most general setting it's worthless because of the
> > multi-tasking (or SMP) nature of the processing. I tried
>
> Just use spin-locks. To say its entirely worthles, might, in my opinions
> be a bit strongly dismissive.
>
Spin-locks in user-space?
Norm
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Victor Yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Norm Dresner
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size que... Calin A. Culianu
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Iwo Mergler
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size que... Calin A. Culianu
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Norm Dresner
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size que... Calin A. Culianu
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Calin A. Culianu
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Victor Yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size que... Calin A. Culianu
- RE: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size queryage Dresner, Norman A.
- RE: [rtl] RT-Linux patch proposal for RTF size que... Calin A. Culianu
