Hi Dave,

On Die, 21 Dez 1999 David Schleef wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 12:51:07AM +0100, Jochen Kuepper wrote:
>> 
>> It doesn't actually matter wether it is called patch or copyto.
>> I personally prefer the "diff -u" output because to me its simple to read.
>> But then I don't see any other disadvantage of the copyto besides it not
>> being common usage.
>
>You can't tell if copyto failed.  For that reason, you can't even begin
>to attempt to apply it to a kernel it wasn't intended for.

Oh, correct.

Then, there are patch-programs out that don't tell you either (RedHat-6.x
shipps such) :-) But at least you can use a "patch" that tells you.

-- Jochen
        Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Institut für Physikalische Chemie I
        Universitätsstr. 1, Geb. 26.43.02.29, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
phone 02118113681 fax 02118115195  --  www-public.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de/~jochen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/

Reply via email to