On Mit, 22 Dez 1999 root wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Jochen Kuepper wrote:
>> RTLINUX_V1
>> RTLINUX_V2
>> RTAI
>> KURT
>
>I strongly support this. But make it rather __RT....__
Agreed.
>> >API. This should be discussed. My first comment would be that I would
>> >like to see the timing services simplified so that everything can be
>> >specified in nanosecond without the user having to worry about clock
>> >ticks.
>>
>> Well, than people will step in and ask why the hell they don't get the ns
>> resolution they specify :-(
>
>I strongly support making ns a basic time unit everywhere. It is already
>possible to get resolution better than microsecond.
Well, I actually clarified to Stuart before that I agree that ns usage
for timing functions is the way to go - we just have to tell anybody in
advance that he does not get full 1 ns resolution.
Then it was pointed out to me there is something like clock_getresolution
(sorry, I forgot the name already :-).
-- Jochen
Heinrich-Heine-Universit�t, Institut f�r Physikalische Chemie I
Universit�tsstr. 1, Geb. 26.43.02.29, 40225 D�sseldorf, Germany
phone 02118113681 fax 02118115195 -- www-public.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de/~jochen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
