[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 02:38:46PM -0700, Robert Kavaler wrote:
> > Their system is based on:
> > 1. Mach "microkernel"
>
> My technical comment: Yuck.
>
>
I'm with Victor on this. We looked at Mach, 2.5 years ago for about 3
months to see if we could use it as an RTOS. We even had Mklinux DR3
running on x86. I have to say it was a miserable experience, and the
timing guarantees were very poor (I saw one report for the PA-RISC
version that had occasional blips up to 500 milliseconds if my memory
serves). IMHO the only Linux real-time implementations that give
guarantees at the 30 usec range are RTLinux/RTAI.
Regards, Stuart.
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/