[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 02:49:40PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Thanks :-) I've looked carefully at the LXRT real-time model (including the > > extended one) from the RTAI-1.3 distro, and it seems we both try to address a > > common problem: how can we ease development of embedded software running on > > top of a real-time Linux. I think CarbonKernel could give a complimentary > > solution to LXRT, essentially because it uses the simulation approach. I'll > > CarbonKernel gives RTLinux another alternative to reimplimenting LXRT. > Since I have some misgivings about LXRT -- portability and safety and > amount of work needed to maintain, and also programming model > -- I'd be thrilled to see this alternative. Hi Victor, Maybe a better thing to do is to come up with a common LXRT for RTL/RTAI, this way only a single simulation model will need to be implemented. You have some valid points and concerns about LXRT, but why not work together and come up with a solution that we are all happy with. I think the LXRT idea is excellent as it is quickly moving real-time Linux programming into a more familiar programming environment. Regards, Stuart -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
