Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> I still don't understand how RTAI could be called hard-real time when
> there are no kernel modification - CLI/STI are the enemies and I would
> like to know how they are handled in RTAI. What happens when
> SBLive driver calls spinlock_irq_safe ??
You are just showing that I was right . You NEVER read my mails, but
just surfed over them.
Then just for the sake of truth:
in RTAI CLI/STI are as in RTL but ..... in RTAI they were already that
way almost two years ago, in RTL just recently.
I do not want to claim I invented anything, maybe they went that way
because of the need of unifying RTL on PPC needs. In fact PPC is almost
natively fully compliant with RTAI HAL concept (another concept that is
not ours but was leading the way we patched Linux for RTAI, since its
very beginning).
For me it is not a problem being copied, and even not acknowledged, at
the beginning of our both our RTL variant (4 years ago) and RTAI there
were no copyrights in their distributions, you can check it.
In view of the above what I cannot accept is anybody simulating he/she
does not understand my claims without checking what I say.
Ciao, Paolo.
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
