On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:11:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>'core' may be a disadvantageous name....perhaps configure tries to > >>>delete 'core'-files from segfauled processes etc...
> >>Yes, there are some code about this in configure. What to do? Do you > >>have a better name at hand? > >rtnet-core > Mmh, then we end up with the RTAI 3.0 way: rtnet-xxx or rtnet_xxx. What > about "stack"? I think this also hits the mark. I've renamed core to stack, and commited to svn Marc P.S.: still 2.4 only :) -- #!/bin/sh set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \ shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\ echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ RTnet-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-developers
