Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote:
> Dear Jan,
> 
>>> Just to confirm my state of information: This is taken on some slave
> while the master is sending periodic Sync frames over the network, right? At
> which rate?
> Yes, I set the TDMA cycles to 1s and slave offset to 0.1s, maybe that's why
> it could not capture the interrupt. I try to tune the TDMA cycle to 50000 us
> and offset at 2000 us. Attach the trace file again.

50 ms / 2 ms is still too large for this trace. You see that the trace
is only able to cover ~40 ms. So, use a 2 ms cycle with, say, 500 us offset.

> 
>>> Try to leave that TDMA-less demo running for a longer while, or run it at
> a comparable ping rate. Does it stall after a while?
> By the way, I also check with the rtping on both ends and works well even
> after icmp_seq reaching 1000. I also check with ethereal when the TDMA ioctl
> call stalls and I can see the incoming Sync frame and Stage 1 Cfg frame. It
> is further proved in the kernel log message.

OK, I'm believing now. :)

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to