Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Karl Reichert wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Karl Reichert wrote:
> >>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> Karl Reichert wrote:
> >>>>> Very good news: I found the reason for this behavoir/bug now!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm using the attaced rtnet_start script to start the slave (can't
> use
> >>>> the provided one because I don't want RTcfg).
> >>>>> The last command is 'tdmacfg rteth0 slot 0 2300 -s 100 -l rtnet.log'
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If I use this script as attached, I get this weird behavoir that the
> >>>> slave request and calibration reply in a cycle from the past.
> >>>>> If I comment this last comment and enter it manually on console
> (after
> >>>> sucessfull run of rtnet_start), everything works fine. Also a 'sleep
> 3'
> >>>> between the last command and the precending works fine.
> >>>>
> >>>> Private follow-up discussion revealed that this is most problably the
> >>>> same issue as already described here:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.rtnet.user/1891/
> >>>>
> >>>> i.e. it is rt_e1000-specific.
> >>> Seems like. I would suggest that I remove my wiki entry which said
> >>> this is a tdmacfg issue and create a new which deals about rt_e1000.
> >>> There I will describe the workaround so that other rt_e1000 users
> won't
> >>> face the same issues.
> >> Ack.
> > 
> > Please see http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/RTnet:rt_e1000 and edit if
> needed.
> > 
> >>> Do you agree? Or do you think this is sth that needs a change on
> >>> rt_e1000 driver sourcecode?
> >> Well, the ultimate and most comfortable solution would be inside the
> >> driver - if nothing helps a delays before returning from the open
> handler.
> >>
> >> Sigh, I just re-read my last mail on this issue
> >> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.rtnet.user/1891).
> >> Obviously, nothing happened to this know issue for more than a year
> now.
> >>
> >> OK, if this slow line setup of the [rt_]e1000 is a common issue, we
> >> really need that msleep in the setup path, something like this:
> >>
> >> Index: drivers/e1000/e1000_main.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- drivers/e1000/e1000_main.c     (Revision 1136)
> >> +++ drivers/e1000/e1000_main.c     (Arbeitskopie)
> >> @@ -1202,6 +1202,9 @@ e1000_open(struct rtnet_device *netdev)
> >>        e1000_check_mng_mode(&adapter->hw))
> >>            e1000_get_hw_control(adapter);
> >>
> >> +  /* Wait for the hardware to come up */
> >> +  msleep(2000);
> >> +
> >>    return E1000_SUCCESS;
> >>
> >>  err_up:
> >>
> >>
> >> Does it work for you (alternatively, using msleep(3000))?
> >>
> > 
> > msleep(2000) already works (no more sleep in startup script needed), but
> I would suggest to use msleep(3000). I own two cards, one works with
> msleep(2000), the other one needs msleep(3000). So it seems sleeping 2000 ms 
> is
> very short, but stick to 3000 ms.
> 
> I finally committed msleep(3000), will be part of next release (0.9.10).

Added this information to wiki page.
 
> > 
> > If you add this patch to current RTnet version (SVN version), please
> edit the created wiki page (mark as obsolete or sth similiar). Thanks!
> 
> 
> Is this page already reference by some other page? I didn't find
> anything. However, maybe we could create a "known issues (with/without
> fixes)" out of it.

No, it is not. I don't have a clue where I should link it.
This known issue page ... could be a good idea. I guess you are thinking about 
a page with an overview to known issues/bugs and links to their workarounds?! I 
could create such, but what else known issues are out there? Is there any 
overview available?

Karl
-- 
von Karl Reichert

Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to