On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rob Wheeler wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Rob Wheeler wrote:
>>>> I've been using RTnet to talk to EtherCAT devices.  My setup consists of:
>>>>
>>>> EtherCAT Master Library
>>>> RTnet 0.9.10
>>>> Xenomai 2.4.5
>>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.24.3
>>>>
>>>> Due to some stability issues, I wanted to upgrade to Xenomai 2.4.6.1.
>>>> This version of Xenomai doesn't work with 2.6.24.3, so I upgraded to
>>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.27.  Unfortunately, RTnet 0.9.10 doesn't build with
>>>> 2.6.27, so I tried building HEAD of the SVN repository.  With HEAD I'm
>>>> able to successfully build against 2.6.27 and I can load the rtnet,
>>>> rtpacket, and rt_e1000 modules.  However, if I try to do 'rtifconfig
>>>> rteth0 up' I get an error 'ioctl: No such device'.  Any ideas what I'm
>>>> doing wrong?
>>> Not yet. Maybe it is also some RTnet issue. I must admit that I haven't
>>> found the time to test the latest changes intensively. What does the
>>> kernel log report? What does /proc/rtnet/devices say?
>>
>> I don't see anything logged, and I don't see any devices either:
>
> There must be something logged, the bare minimum are some version
> messages from the stack. If it's not in your log file, check dmesg.
>
>>
>> [r...@cak: /usr/local/rtnet/sbin] cat /proc/rtnet/devices
>> Index Name            Flags
>
> Are you sure you unloaded the vanilla e1000 before insmod'ing the
> rt-version?

Ok, I'm an idiot.  The name of the e1000 driver changed from e1000 to
e1000e when I jumped from 2.6.24 to 2.6.27.  If I unload e1000e,
everything appears to be working as expected.

Thanks,
-R

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to