On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Stahnke wrote, at 08/12/2010 01:02 AM +9:00: >> Ok, I see your point. I am normally developing with ruby, so I didn' >> think about the normal application install. >> >> Should we then say that ri/rdoc/examples/test/spec go into a -doc >> package when they are over a certain size or always? > > My opinion is we should create -doc subpackage when they > are large to some extent, especially when such files have compatible > or larger size than those of files needed for runtime. > >> I'd just like to get some consistency here. >> >> Also when we decide we should work with the packaging guys to get the >> wiki page updated for ruby packages. >> >> stahnma > > Something like the following proposal > * Creating -doc subpackage > - Usually ruby gem based rpm installs rdoc/ri document files under > %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}. > Also many ruby gem based rpm installs some additional files under > %{geminstdir} > which are not needed on runtime and are needed for development purpose > only or checking the gem like: > - Rakefile > - spec/ directory > - test/ directory > - examples/ directory > If the total size of these files is compatible or enough larger than that > of the files needed > for runtime, -doc subpackage should be created and these files should be > moved into -doc subpackage. > > Any comments welcome.
I like the proposal, but would like a definitive way to know when to make a -doc package or not to. It would be spectacular if we could make some edits to gem2rpm to do this by default. stahnma _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
