Hiya, On 25 lip 2011, at 16:10, Mo Morsi wrote:
> Since this list is a lot shorter than the corresponding list in Fedora, > perhaps we can get these package maintainers to update to RSpec 2. We're talking here about: rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src (stahnma) rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src (stahnma) rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src (mfojtik) rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src (mfojtik) rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src (stahnma) > Otherwise, perhaps we can leave it in there as there for now, push the > rspec-core and other subcomponents to EPEL, and update the BoxGrinder RPM to > depend on those subcomponents instead of rspec itself? I'm cool with this! This would be same as current Fedora rawhide state. After upgrading above packages we could bump rubygem-rspec to 2.x. Seems reasonable? --Marek > > -Mo > > On 07/22/2011 09:18 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote: >> For EPEL 6 - exactly 5: >> >> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' >> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src >> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src >> rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src >> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src >> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src >> >> For EPEL 5 - also 5: >> >> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' >> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el5.src >> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el5.src >> rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.el5.src >> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-2.el5.src >> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-2.el5.src >> >> --Marek >> >> On 22 lip 2011, at 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >>> RSpec 2 as they are in F16 can be imported into EPEL right now. Any idea >>> how many packages depends on RSpec in EPEL? >>> >>> >>> Vit >>> >>> >>> >>> Dne 21.7.2011 20:49, Marek Goldmann napsal(a): >>>> There is one more thing: >>>> >>>> Now I upgraded to RSpec 2 in Fedora. I plan to submit BoxGrinder to EPEL >>>> 6, but there is only RSpec 1.3. What would be the approach to bump RSpec >>>> there? >>>> >>>> --Marek >>>> >>>> On 18 lip 2011, at 18:49, Mo Morsi wrote: >>>> >>>>> Perhaps we can shoot for doing this w/ F17, and if we are unable to >>>>> migrate all the dependent packages over, then add a rspec1 compat >>>>> package to buy us some more time. >>>>> >>>>> In any case, would rather push this off to F17 myself as a few of us are >>>>> going through and updating alot of the rails related plugins to be >>>>> compatible w/ Rails 3 in Fedora. We're trying to get this done by the >>>>> F16 deadline next week. >>>> --Marek >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ruby-sig mailing list >>>> ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ruby-sig mailing list >>> ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ruby-sig mailing list >> ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > --Marek _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
