On 08/18/2011 01:13 PM, Ivan Nečas wrote: > Question: do RPM for gems differ for different distribution: FC14, > FC15, RHEL5, RHEL6?: > If they do, we could similarly keep separated gem source for every > distribution - this could help us in debugging, if we get report, that > some distro fails with our app.
They can be different, yes. > What do you think about this apporach? I would note that I would prefer patching the upstream. In this case asking rubygem author to release 3.0.5.1 patched gem (not sure if rubygems support such a convention). And then to use it. Is it necessary to put that effort in maintaining our own rubygems just because few developers (incl. me) do use RVM instead recommended RPM gems? I would go for patching upstream if it blocks us (e.g. maybe this case - the gettext issue), but for other cases I would recommend to live with it. -- Later, Lukas "lzap" Zapletal _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
