Dne 21.9.2011 13:46, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 21.9.2011 13:43, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'd like to bring to your attention that there was proposed by Ruby SIG >> meeting as part of FUDCon Milan [1]. I would like to take this meeting >> as change to discuss Ruby future in Fedora. Here are few point I'd like >> to discuss: >> >> * Ruby 1.9.3 for F17. I have already pre-prepared feature page [2] for >> this and I am working towards packaging Ruby 1.9.3. However, there are >> several issues including >> - How to correctly name and version subpackages such as RubyGems, >> RDoc, Rake, IRB >> - How to maintain updates of them late. >> - Directory structure. >> >> * Support of gems for MRI and JRuby. >> - Is it possible to share RubyGems? >> - Is it possible to share gems? >> >> * Support of multiple versions of gems on single installation, e.g. >> Rails 2 vs Rails 3. >> >> * Refresh of Ruby Packaging Guidelines >> - They do not always follow best practices >> - They will need to be updated because of Ruby 1.9.3 >> >> * gem2rpm future and possible extensions >> >> This is list is not exhaustive, so please feel free to add few more >> points, which you think might be interesting to discuss. >> >> Vit >> >> >> >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Milan_2011 >> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3 >> _______________________________________________ >> ruby-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > I have to add few more points immediately: > > * Rails 3.1 for F17 > > * Migration of RSpec to RSpec 2.x > > Vit > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig Another idea:
We should get rid of the .gem in cache subfolder, which makes no sense for RPM. Vit _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
