Mamoru TASAKA wrote, at 01/20/2014 07:00 PM +9:00:
Achilleas Pipinellis wrote, at 01/20/2014 07:37 AM +9:00:
I know that both result to the same thing (if I remember correctly I had
asked Vit about this in IRC), but I have forgotten their real difference.
My attention got caught by a comment Josef made in one of his reviews
[0], saying that rubygem-foo is the new syntax. If that's the case, I
would like to propose 2 changes:
a) A reference in the wiki
b) An implementation for gem2rpm
I guess b) could be fairly easy by changing the templates.
By starting with these steps, there will be a push to use the new syntax
from now on. What do you think?
[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979749#c2
Please use syntax other interpreters do:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl?rd=Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP?rd=Packaging/PHP#Requires_and_Provides
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml?rd=Packaging/OCaml#Requires_and_provides
i.e. use rubygem(foo), not rubygem-foo.
Additional explanation:
The idea here is that ideally like perl or so and pkgconfig(foo), etc, this
type of
dependency should be handled by rpmbuild _automatically_, i.e. rpmbuild
automatically
adds provides/requires rubygem(foo). Currently this is done by gem2rpm, however
if
this could be done on building rpmbuild side, it would be more appreciated.
Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
