On 03/11/2014 04:45 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on draft of Ruby packaging guidelines for F21 [1]. The main > two changes are: > > 1) Simplified packaging of binary extensions (although there is still > one caveat [2]). > 2) Changes due to automatic dependency generators. > > If you have any comments, suggestions, please let me know. > > > Vít > > > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=PackagingDrafts%2FRuby&diff=372210&oldid=372207 > [2] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-January/001484.html > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hey Vit read through the changes, they look good, save one point. Under "Libraries" > "Rubygems" "There '''should''' not be listed any <code>Requires</code> nor <code>Provides</code>, since they are autogenerated." I understand this is a 'should' and not a 'must' but perhaps this restriction should only apply to "rubygem Requires", eg rubygem-curb needs to have a dependency on libcurl which is seemingly in contrast w/ this item. Perhaps something like this would work? "There "should" not be any Rubygem <code>Requires</code> not <code>Provides</code> listed since those are autogenerated" Also what about BuildRequires, will those be autogenerated? Other than that looks great, thx for this, -Mo _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
