As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.
Josef ----- Original Message ----- From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" <[email protected]> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is. Some already raised points: 1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership. 2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out. Projects that could share the namespace: 1. gem2rpm [1] 2. rubypick [2] 3. pkgwat [3] 4. gem-compare [4] 5. isitfedoraruby [5][6] So, what do you think? -------- [0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby -- FAS : axilleas GPG : 0xABF99BE5 Blog: http://axilleas.me _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
