Good news guys. If my testing is correct, this should be fixed by [1].

Vít


[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubypick-1.1.1-4.fc22



Dne 24.6.2015 v 09:40 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> I would be glad if you could help me to investigate, how to make DNF
> to prefer MRI over JRuby (use Recommends, Suggests or epoch for that,
> probably break some bad dependency - there used to be issue with
> rubygem-json). That is the right solution for the future. And along
> the way, JRuby is doing steady progress to work correctly.
>
> So to say, the fix ATM is easy as BR: ruby (btw this is default
> behavior of gem2rpm, so you probably removed this line, because it
> worked for YUM by default, but does not work for DNF) and I don't
> think that removing ruby(release) is the right step. You would need to
> modify all your packages anyway.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 24.6.2015 v 06:37 Dan Allen napsal(a):
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Ken Dreyer <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     I think it makes sense to
>>     just remove the virtual provide from jruby until jruby is more
>>     stable.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I bumped into this same issue. I did find that one solution is to
>> first install ruby, then JRuby won't get pulled in as a transitive.
>> For some reasons, it's winning over MRI Ruby in the dependency closure.
>>
>> To clarify, though, it's not JRuby that's unstable. JRuby is
>> incredibly stable. It's the package for Fedora that's unstable (or
>> renders it unstable).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Dan Allen | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

Reply via email to