----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vít Ondruch" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:17:11 AM > Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild > > > Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > > Hello, ruby-sig folks: > > > > Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/01/22 0:34: > >> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/01/17 20:49: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> It is about the time to start with mass rebuild of packages for Ruby > >>> 2.6, since the change proposal was already accepted in advance. > >>> Finally, > >>> after more then week of waiting, I was also able to obtain side-tag > >>> [2], > >>> so we won't disrupt Rawhide a lot. The Ruby 2.6 is already build there > >>> as well as a few other packages. Now it is time for your help. > >>> > >> > >> Thank you for your nice work for ruby 2.6. > > > My pleasure. Thanks for helping with the rebuild. > > > >> > >> Update for current build status against ruby 2.6: > >> So far (according to repoquery) 96 packages successfully rebuilt for > >> ruby 2.6, and > >> leftovers are: > >> > > > > Again update for current ruby 2.6 rebuild status: > > > > From repoquery, now 100 packages are using "libruby.so.2.6()(64bit)", and > > the leftovers which still uses "libruby.so.2.5()(64bit)" are: > > > > $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=koji-ruby26 > > --whatrequires "libruby.so.2.5()(64bit)" --qf "%{SOURCERPM}" | sort | > > uniq | cat -n > > 1 hivex-1.3.16-1.fc30.src.rpm > > Build fails: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32181239 > > Even for rawhide: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32181237 > > Some tests seem to be segfaulting. > > > I don't think we should spent time with this package, because it has > luckily active maintainers/upstream. > > > > 4 rubygem-json-2.1.0-106.fc29.src.rpm > > Build fails: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32182608 > > Succeeds for rawhide (ruby 2.5) > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32182604 > > Test segfaults. I guess Pavel is working on this: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-json/pull-request/1 > > > Yes, there is additional patch in Ruby which was not accepted upstream > yet. I am not even sure Ruby upstream has commit bit to upstream > repository of Json. > > > > > > 5 rubygem-nio4r-2.3.1-2.fc29.src.rpm > > Build fails: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32182612 > > Even for rawhide: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32182610 > > Some test failure. > > > This is OpenSSL 1.1.1 related and reported already for some while: > > https://github.com/socketry/nio4r/issues/194 > > We should probably disabled the failing test for now. > > > > I'll try to check the rest of the failures, but there is nothing major > IMO. Therefore I am going to ask relengs to merge the side tag back into > Rawhide and we can polish the rest later. > > > Vít
I have here a rubygem-webmock build failure - SEGFAULT in rubygem-ffi: BUILDSTDERR: /usr/share/gems/gems/ffi-1.9.23/lib/ffi/autopointer.rb:175: [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000070 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/849342/ P. _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
