Dne 19. 06. 19 v 16:49 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> Recently, there was opened this ticket: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719647 >> >> In short, there are some issues with -doc noarch subpackages, which are not >> precisely identical coming from different builders, due to embedded >> timestamps. As it turns out, there is SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable >> available in RDoc, which allows to specify the timestamp and therefore >> workaround the issue. And I think this could be useful for our packages, >> therefore I created this PR: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/47 >> >> It modifies %gem_install macro and sets the timestamp for each gem. Is there >> any reason, why not merge this PR? >> > It's probably better to use that variable along with having rpm's > feature to populate that variable on. > > %source_date_epoch_from_changelog Y > > We should probably turn this on in redhat-rpm-config... >
Ah, I was not aware there is something like this possible in RPM. That would be much better to have this enabled by default. So are you going to propose change in defaults? Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
