Hi,

Following the bundling of Racc [1] and did_you_mean [2], I am forced to bundle also OpenSSL. This is due to the StdLib symlinks together with `require_relative` [3] causing double loading issues, e.g.:

    ~~~
    $ ruby --disable-gems -e 'require "openssl"; require "openssl/digest"'
    /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::MD4     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of MD4 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::MD5     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of MD5 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::RIPEMD160     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of RIPEMD160 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA1 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA224     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA224 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA256     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA256 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA384     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA384 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA512     /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA512 was here     /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:52:in `<class:Digest>': superclass mismatch for class Digest (TypeError)
            from /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:16:in `<module:OpenSSL>'
            from /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:15:in `<top (required)>'
            from -e:1:in `require'
            from -e:1:in `<main>'
    ~~~

This is the reason why rubygem-net-ssh is broken ATM [4]. Not sure if upstream is really able to resolve the double loading issue [5]. While I could revert the [3] to resolve the original state, we would need to maintain this patch for the foreseeable future. Therefore it is probably better to keep openssl bundled. This at least will provide experience closer to upstream.


Vít


[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/baf046a6a4d17fa309c9d20fa3db949f6c24aacf

[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/ca69f778a9169c7ff172d2cc9c9d31c6f348cb2f

[3] https://github.com/ruby/openssl/commit/74e03b588f58bcac007d7145c3bb6c4754daa1b0

[4] https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-net-ssh

[5] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16978#note-11


Attachment: OpenPGP_0x0CE09EE79917B87C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to