Dne 19. 03. 21 v 13:45 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
### 4.ruby-libs.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/ruby/io /usr/share/gems/gems/io-console-0.5.6/lib/io The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is included in a package in this package's dependency chain.
The issue here is that rpmlint can't deffer that rubygem-io-console transitively depends on ruby-libs, therefore the symlink is never dangling.
=> This warning was a hint to find "another issue" to fix. The issue is the directory entry `%{ruby_libdir}/io` is duplicated between ruby-libs and rubygem-io-console RPM in ruby.spec.
There is nothing wrong with duplicated directory ownership.
Maybe the directory entry in ruby-libs should be removed like this. ``` @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ MSPECOPTS="" # Platform independent libraries. %dir %{ruby_libdir} %exclude %{ruby_libdir}/bigdecimal* +%exclude %{ruby_libdir}/io %exclude %{ruby_libdir}/irb* %exclude %{ruby_libdir}/json* %exclude %{ruby_libdir}/psych* @@ -964,7 +965,6 @@ MSPECOPTS="" %{ruby_libdir}/find.rb %{ruby_libdir}/forwardable* %{ruby_libdir}/getoptlong* -%{ruby_libdir}/io
This directory is certainly needed for other `io` libraries. There is more then just io-console.
This directory could be in theory dropped from rubygem-io-console, but there is not any benefit IMO. I prefer the rubygem-io-console to be self contained.
Vít
%{ruby_libdir}/ipaddr.rb %{ruby_libdir}/kconv.rb %{ruby_libdir}/logger* ```For this issue, I actually found it by the following way. ``` $ rpm2cpio ruby-libs-3.0.0-146.fc35.x86_64.rpm | cpio -idmv $ rpm2cpio rubygem-io-console-0.5.6-146.fc35.x86_64.rpm | cpio -idmv ... cpio: ./usr/share/ruby/io not created: newer or same age version exists ... ``` The duplicated entry is only this entry. I checked it by the following script. ``` $ cat unpack.sh #!/bin/bash set -ex for RPM_FILE in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio "${RPM_FILE}" | cpio -idmv done ``` I opened the ticket for rpmlint to ask them to implement to detect the duplicated entries here. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/613 What do you think about these errors/warnings I reported on the email? I am happy to send PR to fix it.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
