Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 29.6.2021 klo 11.35:
Dne 26. 06. 21 v 9:32 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Greetings,
Problem 1:
Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
/usr/share/gems/doc
Requires: ruby(rubygems) was automatically created, should that handle
those directories?
I'd say this is false positive, because the package depends on
ruby(rubygems), which owns those directories. IOW this should be fixed
on rpmlint side.
I agree. I filed an issue for fedora-review:
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/418
Problem 2:
Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
The fonts in question are in the -docs subpackage,
/usr/share/gems/doc/<package>/rdoc/fonts. I installed -doc for a
couple of rubygem- packages, they all copied the same fonts. Sure,
using system fonts is just a "should" [3], but it still seems strange
that those fonts are copied over and over in rubygem docs packages.
What is going on here?
This is longstanding issue without proper solution:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224715
I see, thank you for the link. It is like it is, it seems. I will ignore
the situation.
After I realized that I should also install the
fedora-review-plugin-ruby package, I ran into more problems. They were
luckily so simple that I was able to submit a pull request for
fedora-review:
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/416
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
