On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:20 PM Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dne 03. 12. 21 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a): > > Hello, > > > > I've rebuilt it in my ruby-testing COPR: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/2999821 > > > > And I'm also rebuilding dependent packages (`ruby-devel` for now) in > > the rubygems-testing COPR: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/builds/ > > (starting with build 3000168) > > > Nice, thx. > > > > > > I'll let you know in case there're build failures. > > > There apparently are build failures. > > 1) It will probably need some bootstrap round, but
Sure, I'll run the builds several times & build the most needed packages manually (I also have a script for that; maybe it works). Reliable build results will come after that. > > 2) There seems to be something wrong with the binary extensions: > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pvalena/rubygems-testing/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/03000252-rubygem-eventmachine/build.log.gz > > That might be actually related to the issues I had with building rbs and > debug gems. I'll need to investigate. Thanks! Pavel > > > Vít > > > > > > Regards, > > Pavel > > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:57 PM Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> There were quite a lot of stuff happening, such as OpenSSL 3.x support, > >> which kept me away from looking at Ruby 3.1. But now is the highest time > >> and here is the PR you can follow: > >> > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/106 > >> > >> The scratch build if succeeds is available here: > >> > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=79519429 > >> > >> Please note that I have not done any testing except build. > >> > >> > >> And here are a few notes. > >> > >> * -preview1 was not building due to some dependency issues. Therefore I > >> went for more recent revision. > >> > >> * OpenSSL 3.x support is still not finished. > >> > >> * The good news is that there was removed one long standing patch [1]. > >> > >> * The bad news is that RBS and debug gem are not building [2]. Therefore > >> older version of RBS is used and debug gem is completely omitted ATM. > >> > >> * Because Ruby ships more and more stuff as bundled gems, I have > >> introduced *ruby-bundled-gems* package, because packaging the gems on > >> their own does not scale anymore. > >> > >> * dbm/gdbm support was removed from StdLib, therefore also the > >> gdbm-devel dependency was dropped. > >> > >> As always, please give it a try and let me know if you discover any issues. > >> > >> > >> Vít > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/blob/36708f00de18db3b07687aef81e2f749fc3c9608/f/ruby-2.1.0-custom-rubygems-location.patch > >> > >> [2] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18373 > >> _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
