Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/02/07 20:24:
Dear Mamoru,

Could you please check the following two packages which recently started to 
fail?

https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-webmock?collection=f36
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-websocket-extensions?collection=f36

I suspect that this is related to the RSpec update, but the errors are quite 
strange on the first look:


~~~

   1) WebMock::RequestSignature initialization assigns normalized headers
      Failure/Error: @headers = 
WebMock::Util::Headers.normalize_headers(headers)
        #<WebMock::Util::Headers (class)> received :normalize_headers with 
unexpected arguments
          expected: ({"A"=>"a"})
               got: ({"A"=>"a"})
      # ./lib/webmock/request_signature.rb:25:in `headers='
      # ./lib/webmock/request_signature.rb:49:in `assign_options'
      # ./lib/webmock/request_signature.rb:11:in `initialize'
      # ./spec/unit/request_signature_spec.rb:23:in `new'
      # ./spec/unit/request_signature_spec.rb:23:in `block (3 levels) in <top 
(required)>'
      # ./lib/webmock/rspec.rb:37:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

~~~

I am trying to fix rubygem-yard build failure, but currently I see the same 
issue
(on my local machine).

Looks like this is:
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/1460
- was brought by: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/pull/1394

expecially:
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/pull/1394/files#diff-ae171e2be1f799a6704fcbadb353721dda4d078185aa265671e07b14594c72e5R63

# if both arguments end with Hashes, and if one is a keyword hash and the other 
is not, they don't match

So rspec upstream is saying this is correct (again keywords / hash 
separation...), previous
rspec-mocks 3.10.2 behaved wrongly with ruby3 (rspec upstream says), and
rspec-mocks user side has to fix this.

Thx a lot
Vít


P.S. Sorry for not being more helpful, I have to spent some time with CentOS 
Stream 9 to get Ruby into shape there, especially the problematic SystemTap 
support [1].
[1] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18257


Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to