On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:04 PM Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > > IOW this is OpenSSL 3.x issue. There is no simple way around unless you want > > 1) Backport the OpenSSL 3.x patches from Ruby 3.0 > > 2) Use some other workaround such as including upstream version of > OpenSSL gem. > > I'd suggest against building Ruby 3.0 on F36+
Oh thanks. I missed the part. How about using openssl1.1-devel instead of openssl-devel in only Ruby 2.7 (stream-ruby-2.7), 2.6 (stream-ruby-2.6) and 2.5 (ruby-2.5)? I don't see any problems in this way. The openssl1.1 RPM is available on F34~F37(rawhide). https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl1.1 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=32363 > > ## stream-ruby-2.6 > > > > ./configure: line 4122: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' > > ./configure: line 4122: `fi' > > > > ## ruby-2.5 > > > > ./configure: line 4101: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' > > ./configure: line 4101: `fi' > > > > My guess would be some autotools compatibility or some wrongly applied > patch? I know that at times, we need to change the autotools version. > But this was typically done just in RHEL AFAIR. Hmm, I didn't find any patch on RHEL. I may check more about this issue when I have time. -- Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic See <https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/czech-republic-prague-to-utc> for the timezone. _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
