On Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:39:55 AM UTC-4, Ralf Mueller wrote:
>
> On 06/14/2012 04:07 PM, Intransition wrote: 
> > Would you agree that Ruby shouldn't lack for a syntax highlighting 
> library as good as any that exists for 
> > other dynamic languages? I do. But as it stands Ruby lags well behind 
> Python's Pygments 
> > (http://pygments.org/). This should not stand! 
> > 
> > Ruby has a pretty good library in CodeRay (http://coderay.rubychan.de/) 
> but to catch up it needs to support 
> > many more formats. 
>
> If you have a look, on what is scheduled for 1.1, there is a lot to come. 
> But the problem is, when it will 
> code. I added fortran support to coderay more than 2 years ago, but it 
> still hasn't made it into any release. 
> Dont get me wrong, no criticism here. A lot of people seem to have written 
> valid scanners. Might be good to 
> have a place to share them. 
>

Oh, where is this scanner? Could you submit as a pull request with it?
 

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
ruby-talk-google group. To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email 
to [email protected]. For more options, visit this 
group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/ruby-talk-google?hl=en

Reply via email to