On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 4:39:01 PM UTC-4, Robert Klemme wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Intransition <[email protected]> wrote: > > A draft blog post I just wrote: > > > > > https://github.com/trans/trans.github.com/wiki/2012-07-04-crossing-the-assets-divide > > > > > In short, I need to split assets between design and content assets, and > I am > > trying to figure out good names for the two directories. Any > suggestions? > > Funny, when reading the article it occurred to me that you actually > have used two new names already. Why not stick with them? Or use > "assets-design" and "assets-content"? >
I thought the same thing after re-reading what I wrote. But (and isn't there always), while `content` works to describe it, I think it's too broad a term for the directory b/c wiki page files are "content" too but remain outside said directory. I'm not 100% about it, but at this point I've opted to name "assets-content" to "media" and leave the other as "assets". I thought it was rather interesting that for practical reasons this SOC (separation of concern) become necessary. I wonder if it's a good practice more generally that website designers should adopt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ruby-talk-google group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/ruby-talk-google?hl=en
