On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:06 AM, botp <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Graham Menhennitt > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, I had the same. I commented out the call (it wasn't in anything >> that I was going to use anyway). But I agree that proper Cygwin support >> would be good. > > > glad i am not alone = ) > thanks Graham
Why don't you use the Ruby version from the repo? cygwin switched to 1.9 a while back: $ ruby -v ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10 revision 37606) [i386-cygwin] Kind regards robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ruby-talk-google group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/ruby-talk-google?hl=en
