On 4/5/06, Jim Weirich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've been talking about a replacement for 'require_gem' that does not > do the auto-requiring. Several names have been suggested (e.g. > activate_gem). > > Here's what I'm leaning towards: > > require "rubygems" > gem 'rails', '= 1.0.0' > gem 'rake', '= 0.7.0.1' > gem 'activesupport', '= 1.2.5' > gem 'activerecord', '= 1.13.2' > gem 'actionpack', '= 1.11.2' > gem 'actionmailer', '= 1.1.5' > gem 'actionwebservice', '= 1.0.0' > > I like it because I don't have to explain what 'activate' means :) > > Comments?
use_gem ? use_gem 'rake' Otherwise, just gem sounds okay. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
