* Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-08 01:05]: >mswin32 has been outrageously successful, but linux and darwin less-so.
Linux and Darwin don't have so many special cases. Or at least they're far more likely to have a compiler. >I think we'll need a DARWIN_INTEL and DARWIN_UNIVERSAL, a more- >generic linux, and ...? Separating architecture and OS might be a good idea. And perhaps a distinction between source and binary packages? What does a platform of i586-linux mean, exactly? That it's compiled already? That it contains assembly that only works on i586? Special compiler flags? _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
