On 1/13/07, Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just deployed an update to gemtacular which links to the rdocs > which are generated on the server. This is currently experimental as I > am aware that some gems cannot be rdoc'd without errors, however for > most gems there are at least *some* sort of rdocs in there. > > To get to the RDoc links you need to actually view the details about a > gem...eventually I'll make the latest RDoc'd version available in > lists as well. > > Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Might be nice if the gemspec has a field for a url to the rdocs. Then the server wouldn't need to generate all of them -- only the ones that lacked the url. This would allow those who supply the url to fashion the rdocs according to the project's needs (ex- Facets has two sets of rdocs, trying to make one set out of it makes a mess.) t. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
