I also don't imagine the graphs showing significant deployment data, vs development box data. Thus all the mswin/darwin results.
Nic On 4/25/07, Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Jim Weirich wrote: > Eric Hodel wrote: > > On Apr 23, 2007, at 19:14, Jim Weirich wrote: > > > >> I haven't seen the results of tattle yet (perhaps Chad would like > >> to share the gathered data) > > > > Its downloadable from: http://tattle.rubygarden.org/ I don't see a download there, but I see a display of this information. Incidentally, the graph bars don't work with large print, which bleeds outside them and then gets out of sync with them. I expect that is not easy to fix. SVG perhaps? > Thanks. > > Going over the tattle data is interesting. And it raises a number of > questions. [...] > (3) Sheesh, 17% of the respondents are running RubyGems 0.8.11. Just > haven't upgraded? ... or technical issues with later version causing > problems? (inquiring minds want to know). We don't know from what is displayed when these readings were taken. I haven't run tattle for ages. I'd suggest a link on that page to instructions, because I've forgotten what to do. A 3D graph showing time might be interesting, but nontrivial to produce > Hugh _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
-- Dr Nic Williams http://www.drnicwilliams.com - Ruby/Rails/Javascript/Web2.0 skype: nicwilliams (p) +61 7 3102 3237 (Finds me anywhere in the world, via Skype) (m) +4673 768 1389 (Swedish mobile) (f) +61 7 3305 7572 (sends fax to my email) Björnsonsgatan 153, 16 844 Bromma, Sweden
_______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
