On Aug 21, 2007, at 16:22, Steven Lumos wrote:
> Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Aug 19, 2007, at 16:17, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:
>>> We need to make a change for openbsd.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:11:06PM -0700, Eric Hodel wrote:
>>>> def match(cpu, os)
>>>> os = case os
>>>> when /cygwin/ then [ 'cygwin', nil ]
>>>> when /darwin(\d+)?/ then [ 'darwin', $1 ]
>>>> when /freebsd(\d+)/ then [ 'freebsd', $1 ]
>>>> when /^java([\d.]*)/ then [ 'java', $1 ]
>>>> when /linux/ then [ 'linux', $1 ]
>>>> when /mingw32/ then [ 'mingw32', nil ]
>>>> when /mswin32/ then [ 'mswin32', nil ]
>>>> when /openbsd(\d+)/ then [ 'openbsd', $1 ]
>>>
>>> when /openbsd(\d+\.\d+) then [ 'openbsd', $1 ]
>>>
>>>> when /solaris(\d+\.\d+)/ then [ 'solaris', $1 ]
>>>> else [ 'unknown', nil ]
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>> [cpu, os].flatten.compact.join("-")
>>>> end
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> x86_64-openbsd-3
>>>> x86_64-openbsd-4
>>>
>>> openbsd increments versions by .1 every 6 mos when it cuts a
>>> release.
>>
>> All X.Y releases are compatible with each other, correct? If I have
>> 4.0 and upgrade to 4.1, do you need to reinstall anything to keep it
>> working?
>>
>> If they're all compatible then using only the major number is the way
>> to go.
>
> If that's the case then maybe it should be [ 'solaris', nil ].
I think Solaris 8 has the platform solaris2.8 and so-forth. AFAIK, 8
and 9 aren't necessarily compatible the same way OpenBSD 4.0 and 4.1
aren't necessarily compatible.
> Where is the $1 in linux coming from?
Typo. Linux doesn't seem to have any version numbers that autoconf
exposes.
--
Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
