The only question is - why ? Those templates are not complete until parsed by eruby. Pretty WYSIWYG will be broken, so no benefit from that. Dreamweaver templates are its own "templating system" it's only useful for static websites. Libraries, assets - what good are those? You can have your macros/snippets/whatever in your favorite text editor.
Sure RadRails/Aptana are much better, especially when your platform of choice is Linux. You can have an embedded browser inside RadRails while writing templates. After all, WYSIWYG never could beat hand-coding your templates and previewing the result in real web browsers.
-Mislav
On 10/7/06, Ceefour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Though I still wonder whether Aptana will support .rhtml? Since it does
currently not (and I'm not sure how to enable this support, manually
adding the .rhtml "works" for HTML editing, but the WYSIWYG doesn't
work). :-(
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
