agreed, however, when the goal is to expose a resource, then dynamic scaffolding may be good enough.
On 3/1/07, Kevin Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree. Scaffolding is about having something to learn from. If > you're learning from it, you need the code. If you're building from > it, you should have the code. Dynamic scaffolding is just for flash. > > +1 for deprecation > > On 3/1/07, Josh Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I want to raise some discussion on whether dynamic scaffolding should > > be deprecated or not? > > > > I don't think it has any real production value. I've seen examples of > > improving dynamic scaffolding to work better with resources, but I > > don't think they belong in core. If anything, dynamic scaffolding > > would serve better as a plugin. > > > > Anyone agree? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Kevin Clark > http://glu.ttono.us > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
