On May 23, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> >> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8305 >> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8308 > > An XML namespace has to be declared to be valid xml, so the patches > submitted seem to leave us in the same situation where .to_xml will > produce invalid xml. > > So given Module::Model, the only options I can think of are > <module_model> or <model>? Which is better or worse for your > particular situation? > what about '<module-model>' since '-' cannot possible be part of a ruby class/module name? it allows for <module-foo_bar> etc. -a -- we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being better. simply reflect on that. h.h. the 14th dalai lama --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
