On Jul 7, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> >> I just don't think that the content type should mandate the template >> format. It should prefer a specific format, but if that format >> doesn't exist, I think it should use the Accepts header to determine >> other template formats. > > There be dragons. The accepts header is a constant source of > shenanigans for those of us who run regularly-crawled public sites. > Browsers send junk, don't rely on it. Yeah, but could it at least be used for preference? So of the Accepts header has "text/javascript; text/html", it would look for rjs, then html? Brandon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
