> > > On top of that, why is one of the mentioned manuals on the > > > documentation page "Upgrading to Rails 1.0"? We've already gone to > > > 1.2 and 2.0 isn't that far away, updates that include some fairly > > > substantial changes. There's a link to "Rails Weenie" in the "by the > > > users" section that doesn't work, there are 2 open source repositories > > > listed that don't work, Hieraki and rforum, and about half the links > > > that do work are from 2005. > > > > Rails doesn't owe you anything -- it's up to concerned people to > provide constructive help, rather than demanding Someone Else Does It.
So who should update the official webpage with working links then? Is it world-editable by anyone? Is there any way Scott, or anyone, can make manuals.rubyonrails.com work? Is it wrong to assume that the maintainers of the webpage take responsibility for it working at all? Tomas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
