Agreed. I'll get a working day/week with nuked year/month patch knocked up in the next few days.
Any better ideas welcome in the meantime. - tom On 9 Sep 2008, at 21:17, "Michael Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We could also consider 52 weeks in a year as an option? But this >> still >> skips out months... > > Plus it's wrong during leap years... > >> >> The last option, is removing support for fractional months (and >> years?) by making Numeric#months a method on Integer instead of >> Numeric? We could even put a depreciation error message on >> Numeric#months. >> >> >> Which way are other people thinking? > > Much as it pains me to say it, the best option seems to be removing / > deprecating the use of fractional years and months. There's just not > a nice solution in either case. > > -- > Cheers > > Koz > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
