On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 23:49, Xavier Noria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM, DHH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I still like Base both as a name for what the thing is, it's the base > > class of Active Record, and for its reusability across different > > frameworks, like ActionController::Base, ActiveResource::Base, etc. > > But we've ApplicationController < AC::Base to put common stuff. Modulo > de impedance in the docs I explained, don't you think ApplicationModel > < AR::Base makes sense for the same purpose in Rails? Nothing prevents people from writing: class ApplicationModel < ActiveRecord::Base self.abstract_class = true end class User < ApplicationModel # ... end --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
