On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Xavier Noria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3rd version. Same algorithm but I've got several mappings off-list: > > http://pastie.org/301432 > > Yeah, looks like ~1400 is a reasonable figure.
Really interesting stats, given the ever-present meme of 'it's impossible to get patches into rails' this is a nice counter-example. What would be really interesting would be graphs over time, etc etc. But this is a really cool little dataset :) > > > -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
