> Will do! Thanks for the feedback. If you'd like push access to a repos on the rails account, we can give that to you. But I agree with mislav, let's get people using your new repository instead.
We can remove our one and replace it with a fork of your official one to make it clear who's in charge. > - Ken > On Nov 4, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > > Rails core decided long ago that it will not host adapters (other than ones > currently in). > So, separate repo +1 > You will have more control. > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 17:47, Rich Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I would vote for having a dedicated 'official' repo. It would help >> sort out which version is the 'one'. >> >> Rich C. >> >> On 11/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > A few of us are putting some finishing touches on the latest SQL >> > Server adapter and plan to have it ready for a rails 2.2 release. My >> > question is should we create a new github account that would be the >> > official repo for it or is there a possibility that it can be hosed >> > under the /rails as a project with a group of us added as >> > collaborators? >> > >> > It would see to me the easiest thing maint wise would be to create our >> > own official space on github vs the disparate repos we have now, but >> > thought I would ask. >> > >> > >> > - Ken >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > > > > > > -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
