Little too late for 2.3, don't you think ;-)
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2009/3/16/rails-2-3-templates-engines-rack-metal-much-more

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Stephen Bannasch
<stephen.banna...@deanbrook.org> wrote:
>
>>Hey all,
>>
>>As  2.3 RC2 is out, the plan is to have the 2.3 final release out as
>>early as possible. So we'd like to make the last call for patches. If
>>you have any pending patches that you want in 2.3 final release,
>>please speak now. Not very keen on accepting refactoring patches or
>>new features at this point as they can wait. But if there are any
>>critical bug fixes or anything that should block the release, do post
>>it in the replies.
>>
>>Thanks for all the contributions. 2.3 is looking really solid !
>
> I'd like to see the patch in this ticket added:
>
>   Add JDOM (JRuby) as XmlMini backend
>   http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/2238
>
> I'm working on adapting Aarons, work in
> test/xml_mini/nokogiri_engine_test.rb into a patch for testing all
> the alternate backends for xml_mini.
>
> Here's the current state of the test:
>
> http://github.com/stepheneb/rails_hash_from_xml/blob/823a8b6b4c2bad04a27e9131082d816e8c19990e/test/test_rexml_equality.rb
>
> Right now the Nokogiri and the JDOM adapter pass all 10 tests I've adapted.
>
> LibXML fails 2.
>
> FYI: speed converting a 1.8MB xml file to a hash using Hash.from_xml
>
> * libxml-ruby was 25 faster than REXML
> * nokogiri was only 1.6 times faster
> * JRuby-REXML was 3 times faster than MRI 1.8.6
> * JRuby-JDOM was 10 times faster
>
>
> >
>



-- 
Cheers!
- Pratik
http://m.onkey.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to