On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Nate W<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > 2) Any AR changes in the works that would affect this? >> >> Yes, but in a postive way. Miloops' ARel branch at least centralizes >> all the query generation, hopefully you can leverage some of the >> tidying he's done to get a head start on your work. > > Cool, I spoke with miloops via email about this and he was > enthusiastic like me. > > What should the next steps be? Should I start putting bind variable > support into ARel, and then when that's all merged upstream in to AR, > AR will get bind variables? > > Or should I wait until after the merge and look at it then? (I guess > my real question is: Is ARel going into AR "as-is" or will it be > changed/refactored significantly?)
As-is. ARel will use bind vars throughout and AR can take advantage. Either way, we can attack the problem from both ends. Check out miloops' rails fork (which will be merging to master in the near future) and take a look at how relations are built and composed. Best, jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
