On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Mislav Marohnić
<mislav.maroh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 15:31, Stephen Celis <stephen.ce...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some may feel that something like "text_field_tag 'email', nil, :type
>> => 'email'" is good enough, but this doesn't work for "text_field"
>> because any "type" option is overridden to "text" (this could be fixed
>> with a smaller patch).
>
> I suggest making this smaller patch, since it fixes a bug that prevents
> people from specifying arbitrary types for form inputs. Next, I would make a
> patch that adds method_missing to form builder and allows things like
> `anything_field`, which creates an input with type="anything". This is might
> be a good future-proof solution until the HTML5 spec is finalized—what do
> the others think?

If in the future there's a new input type people using old versions
could define their own helper as a last resort. I don't think this use
case deserves a solution with method_missing. Prefer explicit methods
here.

I mean, if we expected dozens of new input types it could be worth it
perhaps, but...

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.


Reply via email to