Did you open an issue for this? if not would you mind to do it so it can be discussed there?. Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ned <rails.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just tried my project from scratch and generated using rails RC, > rather than just changing the version in the Gemfile. > > Didn't work, but was worth testing :) > > If anyone has an idea, or a thought of why this change was made, would > be good to hear > > cheers :) > > > > On Aug 2, 6:56 pm, Ned <rails.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In beta4 I could do this: >> >> resources :sections do >> get :new, :on=>:member >> end >> >> But not with RC >> >> If I change "new" to be something else, it will work >> >> So it seems that "new" is now treated like a reserved word of sorts? >> >> I really need to share the new method between "sections/new" and >> "sections/1/new" because my structure is a tree, so it makes sense to >> re-use >> >> Example >> >> /section/1/new/ >> >> is so much cleaner (and dry) compared to >> >> /section/new/?parent=1 >> or >> /section/1/new_child >> >> Anyone have an opinion or suggestion? >> >> cheers! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
