That's why there are route tests, right?
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Colin Law <clan...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 4 January 2012 17:13, Nick Sutterer <apoton...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, just wondering why it makes sense to verify routing in an
> > AC::TestCase test.
> >
> > class XX < ActionController::TestCase
> > it "returns an empty cart" do
> > post :create
> > ...
> > end
> > end
> >
> >
> > If I have no routing set up:
> >
> > Failure/Error: post :create, :format => "json"
> > No route matches {:controller=>"carts", :action=>"create"}
> >
> > Since I only wanna test my controller action why would I need routing?
> > Any hints on this, or is this just a relict that can be removed?
>
> What would be the purpose of a controller action without a route to
> it? There would be no way to invoke the action either from a test or
> from a browser.
>
> Colin
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
>
>
--
Luiz Felipe G. Pereira
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
